You are an advanced practice nurse (APN) leader at a fictional non-profit community hospital, St. Mary’s General Hospital. Your Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) has asked you to design and implement a hospital-wide Quality Impr
13 min read
Quality Improvement Initiative Project
Assignment: Quality Improvement Initiative Project
Overview
You are an advanced practice nurse (APN) leader at a fictional non-profit community hospital, St. Mary’s General Hospital. Your Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) has asked you to design and implement a hospital-wide Quality Improvement (QI) initiative that engages nurses and builds their QI skills.
Key Requirements
- Develop a comprehensive QI initiative that promotes nurse engagement and skill development
- Demonstrate familiarity with QI processes, leadership approaches, and graduate-level critical analysis
- Integrate evidence, best practices, and research from at least 12 scholarly sources
- Align your proposal with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan (provided on Blackboard > Assignments)
Paper Structure & Grading
Follow the grading rubric precisely. Omitting or vaguely addressing any criterion will lower your grade or result in a non-pass. Each section below maps directly to the rubric:
Introduction
- State the purpose and scope of your QI initiative
- Preview the paper’s structure
Background & Significance
- Define Quality Improvement and its importance to healthcare, patients, and stakeholders
- Explain how QI connects to all nursing levels, emphasizing nurse leaders
- Identify the first step your APN leader will take, including:
- A specific QI tool or measure
- Rationale for its selection
- How to interpret and apply findings to guide decision-making
Initiative Development
- Outline strategies to engage nurses actively in QI
- Describe leadership style(s) and approaches you will use
- Detail resources, training, and support mechanisms
Implementation Plan
- Present a step-by-step rollout timeline
- Assign responsibilities and communication channels
Evaluation & Sustainability
- Define clear metrics and data-collection methods
- Explain how results will inform continuous improvement
- Propose strategies to sustain nurse engagement over time
Conclusion
- Summarize key recommendations
- Reflect on potential challenges and mitigation strategies
Resources & Submission Guidelines
- Download St. Mary’s Mission, Vision & Strategic Plan from Blackboard > Assignments.
- Review the detailed grading rubric in the course shell.
- You have one submission opportunity, late or incomplete work may not be accepted.
- Refer to the syllabus for formatting, citation style, and grading policies.
Tips for Success
- Be specific and succinct, avoid vague statements.
- Integrate multiple, credible sources; each reference must support a clear point.
- Align every element of your proposal with the hospital’s strategic goals.
- Proofread for clarity, coherence, and APA formatting.
Additional Resources You Might Explore
- Example QI tools: Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, Root Cause Analysis, Lean methodologies
- Leadership frameworks: Transformational, Servant, and Situational Leadership
- Peer-reviewed journals on nursing QI best practices (e.g., Journal of Nursing Care Quality, BMJ Quality & Safety)
This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. APA must be strictly followed. The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page]. Penalty will be imposed for exceeding or not meeting the minimum page requirement.
REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.
Great resource to assist you: Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University
StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital.pdf
Submission
Text Editor
Press Alt + F10 to access toolbar options
Word count: 0
Drag files here
Maximum size: 512 MB
or
Details & Information
Rubric Details
Maximum Score
100 points
Excellent
Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper
5
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper
4
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear or no introduction of concepts to be presented in the paper
3
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.
0
Excellent
Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct and specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is well supported with evidence and literature throughout.
10
Satisfactory
Identifies, describes, and demonstrates a good but not sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct but somewhat non-specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is mostly but not fully supported with evidence and literature throughout.
8
Unsatisfactory
Identifies, describes and demonstrates an incomplete and vague understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Missing, incorrect and/or vague identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures, and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is not well supported with evidence and/or literature throughout.
6
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.
0
Excellent
Clear, detailed, and comprehensive description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a clear & comprehensive discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is well supported by the literature, evidence, and research.
10
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a somewhat unclear discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is mostly but not fully supported with evidence and literature throughout.
8
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear and/or missing description of one or more of the following including personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents an unclear, vague or missing discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and vague and/or unclear or missing plan for attaining these skills that fails to be well supported by the literature throughout
6
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
4
Excellent
Clear, detailed, and comprehensive strategy outlining exactly how the nurse leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is comprehensively and well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence and research.
15
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague strategy outlining generally but not exactly how the leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is supported by a national QI initiative but only somewhat supported by QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence, and research.
12
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear or missing strategy outlining how the leader plans to develop the QI initiative which fails to detail the processes, education, tools and/or skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. The plan fails or is not well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence, and research.
9
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
6
Excellent
Specific, detailed and clear description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a detailed outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long-term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.
10
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a good but somewhat vague outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Somewhat but not fully supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.
8
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear or missing description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a vague, unclear or missing outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (one or both short & long term goals) that is not aligned with one or more national QI initiative and is not linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Fails or not well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
6
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
0
Excellent
Clear, detailed and comprehensive strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Detailed and comprehensive strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that is grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.
10
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Somewhat vague strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that may or may not be grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Somewhat but not fully supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
8
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear or missing strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Vague, unclear or missing strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that may or may not be grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Fails or not well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
6
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
0
Excellent
APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
10
Satisfactory
APA formatting is mostly followed throughout the paper with mostly correct citations with at least 10 references. References clearly support the cited text within the paper. 10 REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up
8
Unsatisfactory
Multiple errors in APA formatting throughout the paper identified. Fewer than 10 scholarly references provided. References fail to support the cited text within the paper. Less than REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.
6
Unacceptable
Fewer than 10 current sources are used. Less than 9 REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.
0
Excellent
Clear, detailed and comprehensive evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Specific and detailed strategies and examples are provided to address the main barriers that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.
10
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Somewhat specific and vague strategies and examples provided to address the main barriers that mostly but not comprehensively demonstrates understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Somewhat but not fully supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
8
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear or missing evaluation of barriers and/or facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Vague, unclear or missing strategies and/or examples provided that fail to demonstrate understanding of the QI process and/or role of the APN leader. Fails or not well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
6
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
0
Excellent
Comprehensive examination of principles of social leadership that fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment with specific and detailed examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.
10
Satisfactory
Mostly clear but somewhat vague examination of principles of social leadership that mostly but not fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment. Somewhat vague or missing examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Somewhat but not fully supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
8
Unsatisfactory
Vague, unclear, or missing examination of principles of social leadership that vaguely or fails to integrate these qualities as they relate to the role of the APN leader in today’s healthcare environment. Vague or missing examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Fails or not well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence
6
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
0
Excellent
Summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a succinct and comprehensive manner. Provides appropriate references and citations to support concluding comments.
5
Satisfactory
Somewhat summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a mostly clear but somewhat generic manner that fails to be entirely comprehensive for the student’s content. Somewhat but not fully supported by references and citations.
4
Unsatisfactory
Vague and unclear summary of the key points made throughout the student paper that provides a generic rather than specific and comprehensive summary of the student’s content. Fails or not well supported by referenced and citations.
3
Unacceptable
Unclear summary of the key points made throughout the student paper that provides a generic rather than specific and comprehensive summary of the student’s content. Fails to be supported by referenced and citations.
0
Excellent
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness. writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper. The paper is developed using APA approved headings throughout the paper.
5
Satisfactory
Somewhat concise and clear grammar and spelling were used. Guidelines were mostly used to guide the paper's content. Some spelling and grammar issues (less than 3-4 errors within the paper). The paper is developed using an introduction APA-approved heading- but no headings within the rest of the paper.
4
Unsatisfactory
Many deficiencies in grammar, spelling, or failure to follow the assignment guidelines. Writing has frequent spelling and grammar errors. The paper is not developed at the graduate level of APA formatting- no headings, etc…
3
Unacceptable
An exceeding amount of deficiencies in grammar, spelling, or failure to follow the assignment guidelines. Writing has consistent spelling and grammar errors
