Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice
The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.
Your presentation should:
1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.
Note: Read Chapter 9 in Edelman, C. L., & Kudzma, E. C. (2021) to inform your response.
Submission Instructions:
- Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
- Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
- PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
- The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
- Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
- Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Graing Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Presentation Rubric
|
Presentation Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of 4 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding 3 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding 2 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding 1 pts No Submission 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation 4 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the 3 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and 2 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 1 pts No Submission 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses 4 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all 3 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but 2 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, 1 pts No Submission 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to 4 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to 3 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to 2 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to 1 pts No Submission 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer description |
Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and 4 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing 3 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and 2 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. 1 pts No Submission 0 pts |
/4 pts |